top of page

GTM tech stack consolidation: Half a 3-year savings goal in two quarters

Oct 1
4 min read

Updated: Oct 13

51% of a 3-year goal · 2 quarters · PE-backed $250M+ ARR

51% of a three-year GTM technology savings goal, reached in two quarters. That's one-sixth of the time, with the next wave of contracts already queued at handoff.


The company was PE-backed, $250M+ ARR, and grown by acquisition. GTM tech stack consolidation at a company like that usually runs on the renewal calendar. This one ran on usage.


How a GTM stack gets this big

Nobody buys a bloated stack. You inherit one, a deal at a time. Each acquisition brings its own engagement tool, its own enablement platform, its own data provider. Every one of them was the right call for the company at the time. Five or ten acquisitions later, you get overlap that takes a transformation to fix, not a cleanup.


You also get contracts on different clocks and different paper: separate terms, separate owners, separate auto-renew clauses. That's the real problem, and reconciling it comes first. When renewals are scattered across the year and nobody has one view of what's signed, consolidation never has a single moment where it's obviously time. So it happens one renewal at a time, and mostly it doesn't happen.


A sample renewal calendar for a core company and five acquisitions, with engagement, enablement and data tool renewals scattered across all twelve months | GTM tech stack consolidation
Every acquisition brings its own renewal dates. There's never one obvious moment to consolidate.

GTM tech stack consolidation starts with usage, not contracts

The usual play is to wait for the renewal date, then decide. By then the tool is still in daily use. Nobody has migrated. The workflows still run through it, and the vendor knows it. So you renew for one more year and promise to start earlier next time.


Stop using the tool first

Flip the order.


  1. Measure who actually uses each tool. Logins aren't usage. Find the workflows that run through it and the people who depend on them.

  2. Set the stop-using date first. Pick the date the last user moves off before you look at the contract.

  3. Move the people and the workflows. Training, data migration, rebuilt automations, updated playbooks. This is the real work. Plan it meticulously: who moves, when, and what breaks if they don't.

  4. Let the contract lapse on schedule. Hold the date.


The measure that matters is tools stopped, not contracts cancelled.


The usual play when leaders are have not gone through a GTM tech stack consolidation, where the renewal lands while the tool is still in use and gets renewed, compared with the flipped order: measure usage, set the stop-using date, move people and workflows, let the contract lapse
Flip the order. Adoption is the lever, and the contract is paperwork that follows.

Let the contract catch up

Once nobody uses the tool, the renewal isn't a negotiation. There's nothing left to renew.


Expect pressure from both sides. The vendor will offer a discount to stay, and a few users will swear they can't work without the tool. Don't give in to either. Show up with the data: active users, the workflows that moved, and the date the last user moved off.


What made it repeatable


Clear ownership

A RACI and escalation path, agreed with the CIO up front. GTM technology, IT and finance each knew what they decided, what they were consulted on, and where a stuck decision went next. Stack work dies in the gaps between those three teams. Closing the gaps first is what let the rest move fast.


One gated path for every tool

Baseline, proof of concept, steering committee, sprints. Baseline the usage and the cost. Prove the replacement works for the people who will use it. Get a steering committee decision. Execute in two-week sprints. Same gates for every tool, so nobody argued about process and every wave moved faster than the last.


Where the savings land on the P&L

Savings on the P&L are contracts that didn't renew: money that goes straight back to margin.


The difference is timing. If the users haven't moved when the renewal lands, the forecast slips a year. Adoption-first consolidation moves the savings from the forecast to the P&L because the renewal date stops being the decision date.


Don't forget to give credit to the IT, finance and GTM teams who actually moved the users. That's where the savings really come from.


A quick exercise: list your GTM tools by renewal date. Then list them by active users in the last 30 days. The tools that renew soon and are barely used are your first wave.


A GTM tech stack consolidation two-by-two of GTM tools by renewal date and active users in the last 30 days, with the renews-soon, barely-used quadrant highlighted as the first wave
Renews soon and barely used is your first wave.

Where this fits: Assay, Forge

This Forge Note maps to the six stages of The Rustin Forge Cycle ©.


  • Assay (Discover). Test the ore before you commit to it. Measuring who actually uses each tool is Assay work: a current-state map in the first week.

  • Forge (Execute). Shape it under heat and pressure. Moving the people and workflows in two-week sprints is Forge work.


If your GTM stack is complicated and you don't know where to start, book a Spark Test. Thirty minutes, free, and you leave knowing which tools make up your first wave.


Dustin J. Richardson is the Founder & Fractional Operator of Rustin Forge Consulting LLC, based in Minneapolis and working worldwide.


GTM tech stack consolidation | Rustin Forge Consulting LLC

bottom of page